Reviewed by: Fibe Research Team
When you start looking at investment options, two terms tend to pop up quite often – NFO and IPO. They may seem similar because both involve a ‘first-time’ offer, yet the way they function is not the same. An NFO relates to mutual funds, while an IPO is tied to company shares.
Once you understand the meaning of NFO and how it stands apart from an IPO, it becomes easier to figure out which one suits your approach to investing.
The full form of NFO is New Fund Offer. Fund houses launch them to gather seed money for a new investment plan. This is the stage where early investors get in at the scheme’s face value.
A New Fund Offer is the starting point for a mutual fund scheme. For a short time, investors can buy units at a fixed base value. Think of it like the launch of a new restaurant – the chef (fund manager) is ready to cook, but needs ingredients (capital) before opening the kitchen for regular service.
Once the subscription window shuts, the money raised is invested according to the scheme’s plan. That might mean buying large-cap shares, debt instruments, or a mix. From then on, the price of each unit moves with the Net Asset Value (NAV), which changes daily based on market movements.
While it can be exciting to get into something from the start, remember that you’re entering without past performance data. You’re trusting the track record of the fund house and the fund manager’s strategy.
IPO stands for Initial Public Offering. This is when a company that was previously private decides to invite the public to buy its shares. The sale raises money for the business and, in exchange, investors become part-owners.
Once the IPO period ends, the company’s shares are listed on a stock exchange, and their prices move throughout the day based on demand, supply, and overall market sentiment.
Here’s how the NFO vs IPO differences look when you put them side-by-side:
Feature | NFO | IPO |
---|---|---|
What You Buy | Mutual fund units | Company shares |
Ownership Rights | No direct ownership, only fund units | Part ownership of the company |
Price at Launch | Fixed face value | Fixed price or price band |
After Launch | Units priced at NAV | Shares trade on the stock market |
Risk Source | Linked to the fund’s portfolio | Linked to the company’s business performance |
Regulated By | SEBI mutual fund rules | SEBI listing regulations |
There’s no one-size-fits-all answer to IPO vs NFO or which is better NFO or IPO. It really depends on your style as an investor:
NFOs have their own set of limitations:
An NFO launches a mutual fund scheme and sells fund units. An IPO sells shares of a company, giving investors a direct ownership stake.
The main issue is the lack of performance data. Also, in close-ended schemes, you can’t redeem units before maturity unless they’re listed and traded.
With open-ended schemes, yes, after the NFO period ends. With close-ended schemes, you generally have to wait until maturity.
Both NFOs and IPOs are ways to start fresh in the investment world, but they serve different purposes. Your choice should depend on your risk appetite, investment horizon, and the type of returns you’re aiming for.
And here’s something worth knowing – if you already have mutual fund investments but need quick access to money, you don’t necessarily have to sell them. Fibe Loan Against Mutual Fund lets you borrow up to 80% of your fund value for six months, with interest rates starting from 11% per annum. It’s a way to unlock funds without disturbing your investment journey.